Moderator: Johanna
Usually it's the letter u which the most troublesome for beginners. But I guess ø may give you a field day as well.Amaethon wrote:Okay, so Im a little confused about Norwegian pronunciation entirely, but ø is definitely the letter I have the most trouble with.
Are you serious? The Norwegian letter ø is somewhat like oo in foot!? Personally, I would say that ir in stir is the closest approximation.Gormur wrote:The closest sound in English would be the oo in foot.
Amaethon wrote:Hey,
Okay, so Im a little confused about Norwegian pronunciation entirely, but ø is definitely the letter I have the most trouble with. I have heard that it is pronounced u sometimes, and others that it is pronounced ir. Help? XD
If you're feeling nice, wanna tell me how to pronounce all the letters? Haha...
RaseriSykdomIldebrannen wrote:Adding to that, I must say that English speakers everywhere have so many different dialects themselves, that it's nearly impossible to find a phonic that would apply to them all... + it's just so difficult to explain how something sounds without the other person actually hearing it *sigh*... Dratted Tower of Babel....
Kirk wrote:The vowels in "foot" or "stir" are really not very close at all.
Hunef wrote:Kirk wrote:The vowels in "foot" or "stir" are really not very close at all.
The vowel in 'stir' is much closer than the vowel in 'foot', for sure. But to be honest, I pronunce 'stir' with the vowel [œ] since it is the way someone from Sweden approximates it. So, in my "dialect" of English, 'ir' in 'stir' is very close to the correct pronunciation of Norwegian ø.
Hunef wrote:Kirk wrote:The vowels in "foot" or "stir" are really not very close at all.
The vowel in 'stir' is much closer than the vowel in 'foot', for sure.
Rounin wrote:Wow, really? We have the words "sne" and "fjel" as alternatives to "snø" and "fjøl"/"fjæl", and old people may have a greater tendency to use those if their language is influenced by Danish. Similarly, we have "hand" as an alternative to "hånd". I've never heard of a systematic correspondency though.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest