Postby ceid donn » 2013-02-06, 18:44
OK, Mr. Chair of the Austrian Society of Celtic Studies who wrote my text does a crap-o-rrific job of explaining Sengoídelic numbers which could have been easily rectified by more comprehensive tables, so I fuddle onward, correcting my mistakes as I go...
668
[flag]nv[/flag] hastá̜a̜di neeznádiin dóó bi'aan hastádiin dóó bi'aan tseebíí
[flag]br[/flag] c'hwec'h kant, eizh ha tri-ugent
[flag]sga[/flag] a ocht sescat ar sé cét
Last edited by
ceid donn on 2013-02-09, 6:09, edited 1 time in total.