lichtrausch wrote:So being consequent, do you think that the revival of Hebrew as an everyday language was a waste of resources?
lichtrausch wrote:what do you suppose that country down at the bottom of the East Asian Cultural Sphere is then?
lichtrausch wrote:I think Taipei 101 looks fantastic.
Draven wrote:Are you equating the loss of a language to a change in the way a language is written?
Vietnam has always been a gateway between the two realms, and it doesn't have to categorize itself on any account. Isn't it arrogant for a single individual to decide which cultural sphere a whole culture should belong to?
lichtrausch wrote:Nope, just comparing them. So what's your answer?
lichtrausch wrote:That single individual is you mate.
lichtrausch wrote:The rest of the world seems to be in agreement that Vietnam is part of the East Asian Cultural Sphere.
Draven wrote:Answer to what? A logically unfounded question? Hah right, I might as well criticize Family Guy.
I don't know what you mean by "the rest of the world", but most Chinese, Japanese and Koreans certainly don't see Vietnam as a part of now-glittering East Asia. To them it's simply a hot and impoverished country far far away. A Korean lady where I'm working was almost nonplussed to find out my nationality, because she thought Vietnamese ought to look and sound "more Southeast Asian". Meanwhile there are plenty of ordinary as well as academic people in the West who group Vietnam instead with Thailand and the Philippines, so your perspective, it seems, is not at all balanced (which, given your affinity to the Chinese civilization, fails to surprise me).
現在の地域区分で言うと「東アジア」と重なる部分が大きく、現存国家の中では、中国両岸、ベトナム、南北朝鮮、日本などがここに含まれる。
lichtrausch wrote:Do you think that the revival of Hebrew was a waste of resources?
lichtrausch wrote:I've never heard any authority not include Vietnam in the East Asian Cultural Sphere [...] Perhaps you'd like to show evidence of even one authority on the subject claiming Vietnam is not a part of the East Asian Cultural Sphere.
lichtrausch wrote:You're the individual making the bold claim, not me.
lichtrausch wrote:The well-researched Japanese Wikipedia article on the subject firmly puts Vietnam in the East Asian Cultural Sphere.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Culture_of_Vietnam wrote:Long periods of domination and interaction with its northern neighbor, China, has resulted in Vietnam's historic inclusion as part of the East Asian Cultural Sphere, [...] However, the major stimulation of Vietnamese culture's development comes from indigenous factors.
Draven wrote:- Is reviving the indigenous language of a diasporic people with the intention to reunify that people a waste of resources? Maybe not.
- Is reviving one non-indigenous, derivative method of writing a living language to replace another non-indigenous, derivative method of writing that same language, just because you feel like doing it, a waste of resources? Well, what do you you think?
lichtrausch wrote:I've never heard any authority not include Vietnam in the East Asian Cultural Sphere [...] Perhaps you'd like to show evidence of even one authority on the subject claiming Vietnam is not a part of the East Asian Cultural Sphere.
I haven't seen any source claiming the culture of Vietnam is not a part of the larger SE Asian culture either. Perhaps you would like to prove that "East Asian" and "Southeast Asian" negate each other. Specifically, prove that to the Singaporeans.lichtrausch wrote:You're the individual making the bold claim, not me.
"Bold" statement? I'm merely saying that Vietnam can't fall conveniently in either spheres because there are conflicting viewpoints concerning its nature. Acknowledging multiple perspectives is a bold action to you? But hey, I shouldn't be surprised.
Your bold claim is to say that "East Asian" is the only valid category for the Vietnamese culture, upon hearing which anyone with greater tolerance for ambiguities would disregard you as an absolutist fool.lichtrausch wrote:The well-researched Japanese Wikipedia article on the subject firmly puts Vietnam in the East Asian Cultural Sphere.
Social and cultural analyses reflect the views of authors. If someone cares enough to write a "well-researched" paper (whatever your standards are) arguing that the Vietnamese culture have typical traits of both EA and SEA, I guess such a paper wouldn't make that Vietnam-firmly-belongs-to-East-Asia-because-that's-the-way-I-like-it theme of yours look good. And the note on Vietnam in that very article you cite happens to be "What's so Chinese about Vietnamese", which admits the native SE Asian core of the Vietnamese language is still largely intact.
Citing a Wikipedia article to support one's stance is ridiculous by itself, but I'll go with your flow, so here:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Culture_of_Vietnam wrote:Long periods of domination and interaction with its northern neighbor, China, has resulted in Vietnam's historic inclusion as part of the East Asian Cultural Sphere, [...] However, the major stimulation of Vietnamese culture's development comes from indigenous factors.
That, combined with Vietnam's geographic position, is a breeding ground for counter-arguments.
Not everyone agrees with you on this matter. And culture, not being rocket science, is defined by the opinions of all of those living it and perceiving it or, in other words, undefinable and allows an enormous extent of ambiguity. The culture of Vietnam doesn't have to be absolutely East Asian or Southeast Asian. How do you know it's not a mix of both? Unlike Japan or Korea, whose East Asian status is not challenged, Vietnam is not a simple case - especially in our time when Vietnam has started to drift away from EA in terms of economy, politics and self-image. The agenda of the invented script i.e. cementing Vietnam into EA is therefore faulty at best. The author doesn't seem to understand that a culture can be whatever it wants to be, and it doesn't have to conform to his personal opinion.
The debate has been splendidly entertaining, but I'd like to end my participation here and let you proclaim victory. I see little benefit in arguing with someone who goes by the premises of "research" and "authority" to decide what a culture alien to them should be, where it should belong to and whatnot. That's arrogance and stupidity, not wisdom.
Talib wrote:How common is the use of Chữ Nôm in the Vietnamese diaspora? In Toronto there are almost as many phở places as Chinese restaurants, it seems, and most have signs in it. Is this for the benefit of the Chinese population, mere decoration or can some Vietnamese actually read it?
Talib wrote:How common is the use of Chữ Nôm in the Vietnamese diaspora?
Talib wrote:In Toronto there are almost as many phở places as Chinese restaurants, it seems, and most have signs in it. Is this for the benefit of the Chinese population, mere decoration or can some Vietnamese actually read it?
In Vietnam literary Chinese remained in use for longer because Vietnamese reading of characters was much more conservative. Vietnamese has a richer phoneme inventory (most importantly, more tones), more elaborated syllable structure and so the homophony problem wasn't as dire as in Mandarin. Have you ever seen reconstructed Middle Chinese? When you see its characters written down in IPA, you'll think you're reading modern written Vietnamese. But even then, the writings between Vietnamese scholars in late 19th century were already very close to our modern speech - comparatively of course.
Return to “South East Asian Languages”
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests