So, it's been a while since I've made a new conlang. But the other day I decided to create a new one. The conlang is supposed to be rather simple (well, simple from my point of view, good thing it's all relative ). I'm still working on it and things may change.
The name of the conlang is Tainyren /ˈtai̯nəɾen/ and the name doesn't mean anything for now, but that will probably change at some point (the meaning, not the name). The language is spoken in the same conworld as the rest of my conlangs (except one).
Orthography and phonology:
Consonants:
<m n nn ŋ> /m n n: ŋ/
<p pp b t tt d k kk g> /p p: b t t: d k k: g/
<s z h x> /s z x ɣ/
<l r j w> /l ɾ j w/
<c q> /t͡s d͡z/
Vowels:
<a e i o u y> /a e i o u ə/
The syllable structure is (C(j))(V)V(V)(n/s), the '(V)' being the non-vocallic part of diphthongs. Any consonant (except the long ones) can appear in the onset position, but only two in the coda position: n and s. There are four types of consonant clusters allowed: /nC/, /Cj/, /sk/, and /st/; the first one last two only inter-vocally, /Cj/ can occur word-initially as well, none are legal word-finally. Vowel clusters are allowed as well as any combination of Vi, iV, Vu, and uV diphthongs.
Allophony:
- /np nb/ <np nb> usually become [mp mb]
- /nm/ <nm> is usually pronounced as [m:]
- /t͡sj d͡zj/ <cj qj> and /tj dj/ <tj dj> usually palatalise to [t͡ɕ d͡ʑ]
- similarly, /sj zj/ <sj zj> palatalise to [ɕ ʑ]
- /p b/<p b> may be fricativised to [f v] when the surrounding syllables contain fricatives
- /e o/ <e o> can be lowered to [ɛ ɔ] when word-final and unstressed or just unstressed
- the schwa /ə/ <y> may be omitted in certain word-final syllables or when between certain consonants
- the non-vocallic part of diphthongs may be lowered: /i̯ u̯/ to [ɪ̯ ʊ̯]
Omittion of schwa:
- within a word: /nəC/ → [nC] or [ŋC] if C = [k g x ɣ]
- word-final: /nə mə ŋə sə lə xə ɾə/ → [n: m: ŋ: s: l: x ɾ], and /pə/ → [f]
Orthograpic conventions:
- allophony is not represented in the standard orthography, but there is an alternative, more phonetic orthography
- the combinations with n and a velar are always written with <n>, even though the nasal is pronounced as [ŋ] ([ŋk] or /ŋk/ is written as <nk> and not <ŋk>)
- the nasal /ŋ/ is written as <ŋ> but it can be written as <ng> as well, in which case the actual <ng> [ŋg] is written with an apostrophe inbetween: <n'g>
This is more or less it, I think. I may change some bits but probably not. Anywho, any thoughts/comments/questions? Now I have to figure out how those tables work again, and then I can move to grammar ... declensions and conjugations look nice in tables, don't they?