Shark of Capitalism wrote:Synalepha wrote:Shark of Capitalism wrote:I think, alphabets are quite important for linguists
Why?
Maybe because they are somehow related to languages as well as linguists!
Do you know, how?
No, I don't know how.
Moderator:Forum Administrators
Shark of Capitalism wrote:Synalepha wrote:Shark of Capitalism wrote:I think, alphabets are quite important for linguists
Why?
Maybe because they are somehow related to languages as well as linguists!
Do you know, how?
Synalepha wrote:No, I don't know how.
Shark of Capitalism wrote:Synalepha wrote:No, I don't know how.
Does anybody know?
And all Turkic latin alphabets I know are definitely better than cyrillic ones!
Synalepha wrote:Do you know?
Synalepha wrote:By what standards?
voron wrote:Russia's decision to enforce Cyrillic in all its territory is apparently based on political and not linguistic reasons and they openly say it. Even in the article that you quoted:
введение латиницы в Татарстане поставило бы под угрозу общую безопасность и целостность России, а прецедент мог бы создать условия для появления подобных тенденций и в других регионах страны.
Shark of Capitalism wrote:Some people say that alphabets are just matter of politics (somebody said that he just obeyed the orders) but outlawing alphabets is Stalin's nazi politics!
Shark of Capitalism wrote:But the question in general is important too: like the human rights declaration: we have the right or we haven't?
Saim wrote:Shark of Capitalism, this in fact isn’t a linguistics forum
Saim wrote:(Hint: the part where they use Cyrillic is a sovereign state).
Saim wrote:this in fact isn’t a linguistics forum
Johanna wrote:The minority languages of the Soviet Union were a bit of an oddity, to be honest.
Saim wrote:I don’t see why Swedish in Cyrillic is any more absurd than, say, Mongolian in Cyrillic (in fact Swedish is a great deal closer to Old Church Slavonic than Mongolian is).
Shark of Capitalism wrote:Maybe linguists don't like alphabets themselves, just may not say it! Now they are allowed to)))))
Saim wrote:I don’t think alphabets are particularly important to linguists or discussed all that much in linguistic research. I guess they’re somewhar relevant to sociolinguistics and language policy, sure.
Shark of Capitalism wrote:As far as I can say, Serbia is trying to outlaw latin too https://www.segodnya.ua/world/wnews/v-s ... 58901.html
So what is this forum in fact???
Saim wrote:Shark of Capitalism wrote:As far as I can say, Serbia is trying to outlaw latin too https://www.segodnya.ua/world/wnews/v-s ... 58901.html
Nope, false.
Saim wrote:Shark of Capitalism, this in fact isn’t a linguistics forum
UniLang is a non-profit organisation dedicated to languages and language learning. We have aimed to build an on-line language community where people from all over the world with the same passion for languages, whether a language in particular or languages and LINGUISTICS in general, can come together to communicate with one another and find friends and resources to facilitate their learning. -- Help yourself, my Serbian friend)Saim wrote:So what is this forum in fact???
https://unilang.org/about.php?sid=bcb8f ... 0fd53e0b30
Hope that helps.
And through the pleasant community atmosphere here at UniLang, new friendships with people from all over the globe can easily arise.
Shark of Capitalism wrote:So are alphabets important for the people from all over the world with the same passion for languages, whether a language in particular or languages and linguistics in general?
Shark of Capitalism wrote:And through the pleasant community atmosphere here at UniLang, new friendships with people from all over the globe can easily arise.
!
Saim wrote:To what extent would you consider that you're contributing to that atmosphere?
Return to “Politics and Religion”
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest