The person after me game (2)

[dEhiN]

You're absolutely right. I think there would be better gift to buy.

It sounds more natural to say "I think there would be better gifts to buy." If you want to keep it singular, then say "a better gift".

PThe person after me really needs to sleep.

[Antea]

I would rather say that I really need to relax.

The person after me is considering going to an ashram to acquire new knowledge

[france-eesti]

That would be great idea... If I had some free days for that... Which I don't

The person after me would love to sing in opera.

[dEhiN]

That would be great idea... If I had some free days for that... Which I don't

I'm not sure if you specifically meant to use capitals, but this gives the idea of three new sentences. When I use ellipsis (although apparently technically, in this case, the 3 dots are called a suspension point), because I'm usually continuing the same sentence, I wouldn't capitalize the "if" and "which".

The person after me would love to sing in opera.

For me there's a difference in connotation between "sing in opera" and "sing opera". The first one means that the person, whenever they sing, would like to do so operatically. The second one means that the person would like to be a performer in an opera.

[ceid donn]

The person after me would love to sing in opera.

This construction is grammatically correct, but in common usage, native speakers would more likely say "sing in an opera" or "sing in operas." The construction "sing in opera" is typically reserved for specialized speech, in particular academia or musicology, i.e. "Singing in opera is often marked by vocal techniques particular to operatic music." It's kind of a different register of speech, one might say.

Anyhow, while I am a musician and a singer, my singing voice is not suited for operatic music, and I never quite warmed up to operas in general, even though I had to study many operas for my music degree.

The person after me recently rescued a stray dog or cat.

[tiuwiu]

No, but I got my second dog from the dog pound three years ago.

The person after me loves being outside and enjoying nature.

[dEhiN]

Depends on the mood I'm in, but generally, yes, I love nature. It calms and centres me.

Is the person after me more emotionally or logically/rationally driven?

[france-eesti]

I'm 100% logical... Such as supertramp says

But then they send me away to teach me how to be sensible
Logical, oh responsible, practical
And they showed me a world where I could be so dependable
Oh clinical, oh intellectual, cynical

Sometimes, at night, when all the world's asleep, the questions run so deep for the person after me.

[linguoboy]

Questions like, "Did Supertramp ever release another album after Breakfast in America? And if they did, did anyone buy it?"

The person after me couldn't name a single popular band from the last ten years.

[Antea]

I could name some “old” popular Spanish bands.

The person after me believes in astral travels.

[kotrcka]

The person after me believes in astral travels.

Yes, about as much as I believe in healing by microwave oven

The person after me tries to lower his/her sugar income.

[linguoboy]

The person after me believes in astral travels.

The person after me triesis trying to lower his/hertheir sugar incomeintake.

(The most usual interpretation of "sugar income" would be "the money one receives from producing or selling sugar".)

I've been trying off and on for years to consume less sugar, but it's difficult because I rely on it to lift my mood when I'm feeling tired or stressed.

The person after me doesn't have enough good cholesterol in their diet.

[dEhiN]

The person after me tries to lower his/her sugar income.

I assume you mean "blood sugar"? I've heard the phrases "blood sugar level" as well as "blood sugar levels", though frequently it's shortened to "blood sugar". Also, I would add a qualifier of some sort to your sentence. I think it's because "to lower" implies a comparison of two points. Your sentence, as is, feels incomplete to me. If someone said to me "do you try to lower your blood sugar?", I would reply with "by what? what do you mean lower?". So maybe something like "the person after me tries to lower his/her blood sugar every day", or "the person after me tries to lower his/her blood sugar so that he/she doesn't get diabetes". If I didn't want to add a qualifier, then I would rephrase it as "the person after me tries to keep his/her blood sugar low".

[linguoboy]

The person after me tries to lower his/her sugar income.

I assume you mean "blood sugar"?

I assumed differently. (See my correction above.)

[dEhiN]

The person after me tries to lower his/her sugar income.

I assume you mean "blood sugar"?

I assumed differently. (See my correction above.)

Yeah, I noticed that after I submitted my response. I'm not sure why I thought of blood sugar over sugar intake.

[Osias]

The person after me doesn't have enough good cholesterol in their diet.

I read a tweet yesterday saying "good cholesterol" is not a thing.

When the next person says hello, I say goodbye.

[france-eesti]

So I'll just say Good bye and you say hello?

In Penny Lane, there is a barbershop where I can find the person after me having their beard shaved.

[Antea]

So far, I don’t have a beard.

The person after me is very hairy.

[tiuwiu]

No, I'm not very hairy at all.

The person after me wants to eat a donut right now.

[Antea]

Yes, why not? After all, I am still breakfasting

The person after me is very satisfied with the level they have reached in the language they are currently learning.