Eoghan wrote:But I am still sort of disturbed by the fact that some proffessors believe that they could do whatever they want - no matter how safe it sounds, it's still a far too big risk to take until every possible result has been investigated and analyzed...
''' wrote:- every possible result has been analysed. We call this process physics. We're doing the experiment to see whether certain details of our understanding seem to hold true. In order for things to go THAT wrong our understanding would have to be so wrong that it would have hit us by now.
Glowim wrote:''' wrote:- every possible result has been analysed. We call this process physics. We're doing the experiment to see whether certain details of our understanding seem to hold true. In order for things to go THAT wrong our understanding would have to be so wrong that it would have hit us by now.
According to the phisic law we know! But scientist are not so sure about that law (at that high energetic condition). If not, there woundn't be any need to make these kind of test...
Anyway I agree: who thinks a black hole would destroy the world, is scientificly ignorant. And anyway if the world is destroied, well, it means the universe is will be safe by humans!!
Eoghan wrote: but I'm not really sure wether or not the experiment is that important... Anyway, if successful, we all know who'll get this year's Nobel Prize...
Emandir wrote:So, what the use spending millions € in that shit? Wouldn't have it been more useful to spend them in feeding people in Africa, for example?
Emandir wrote:So, what the use spending millions € in that shit? Wouldn't have it been more useful to spend them in feeding people in Africa, for example?
I'm fed up with scientists' arrogance...
And don't tell me again that without scientists I wouldn't be right now writing in this Forum: my life wouldn't be worst anyway, I don't need Internet!
Glowim wrote:..and you wouldn't have a cell phone, or a car, and on your car you couldn't use a GPS...
I could continue with examples, just because almost all of what you use someway derive from science. And about money spent, there are a lot of thing at least useless: military (it would be better avoid any military expense), but also sport expense: where is the utility for olympic games, just to make an example?
Science can help humanity and can help to improve our lives. If discoveries are well used, obviously.
loqu wrote:being fed up with your anti-science shit I'll give you the easy answer: no, it wouldn't. Science is more important.
Varislintu wrote:Emandir, don't you smoke? Shouldn't you be feeding Africans with that money instead of burning it ?
Varislintu wrote:Emandir, don't you smoke? Shouldn't you be feeding Africans with that money instead of burning it ?
Emandir wrote:Sure, improve our lives, which doesn't mean the life of every human being...
I agree with military expenses; and shall I remind you what use man made of most of the scientfic inventions?
And you should have choose better examples than a cellphone (I've lived 30 years without one and my life was not of a Stone age man!) or a car (you'd have to know me better! :p)
Emandir wrote:It's easy to accept anything they say on TV.
It's easy just to say: "Wow! What a great experiment!" without even thinking about what it means really...
You can make fun of what I say as long as you want, I don't even care.
I'm just happy to be still conscious of the world I'm living in and being able to rebel myself, at my own little level....
Just think!
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests