Postby vijayjohn » 2015-08-14, 19:38
Okay, I'm not going to talk about every single point in this post right now, but I will say this much: Some of this is true, and some (in fact probably most of it) is not. For example, Tamil literature does not date back 5,000 years; that's ridiculous. Even the Indus Valley Civilization is not nearly that old. Human writing itself dates back only 7,000 years. Tamil literature dates back to about the 3rd century BC. That being said, it is true that Kolami, Gondi, and Oraon are spoken in North India, that Brahui is spoken in Balochistan, and that all of those are Dravidian languages. It's also true that Prakrit and Pali (both Middle Indo-Aryan) are descended from Old Indo-Aryan, which includes Vedic Sanskrit (and on which Classical Sanskrit is based), and that Prakrit was not considered fit for literature and Sanskrit was used instead (indeed, Indians still consider Sanskrit an extremely prestigious language to this day in a way that even English is not, kind of like how knowing Latin is prestigious in the West, and the shift from Sanskrit towards other languages in Indian literature was gradual) although "Prakrit" is quite a vague term that refers to pretty much any Middle Indo-Aryan language (including Pali).