mōdgethanc wrote:Aes' gwylyth, laith maer!
Which means? (I attempted a mix-and-match translation, but it turned out you easily hate your mayor or there's something about a language. And then there's "gwylyth".)
Moderators:Ashucky, Dormouse559
mōdgethanc wrote:Aes' gwylyth, laith maer!
It means "you're incredibly gullible for trying to translate a sentence in a nonexistent language I made up on the spot".Fox Saint-Just wrote:Which means? (I attempted a mix-and-match translation, but it turned out you easily hate your mayor or there's something about a language. And then there's "gwylyth".)
SostiMatiko wrote:Until now i have not received any critique or even a comment for improving some point, so this confirms what i said.
SostiMatiko wrote:Until now i have not received any critique or even a comment for improving some point, so this confirms what i said.
SostiMatiko wrote:Surely, when people avoid even to criticise it, there is at least one reason for it.
SostiMatiko wrote:Surely, when people avoid even to criticise it, there is at least one reason for it. I figure out more reasons than i said.
Ahzoh wrote:SostiMatiko wrote:Surely, when people avoid even to criticise it, there is at least one reason for it. I figure out more reasons than i said.
That's not why it's illogical. It's illogical because it's confirmation bias towards the first sentence in your post.
linguoboy wrote:Ahzoh wrote:SostiMatiko wrote:Surely, when people avoid even to criticise it, there is at least one reason for it. I figure out more reasons than i said.
That's not why it's illogical. It's illogical because it's confirmation bias towards the first sentence in your post.
More fundamentally, it's also an appeal to ignorance.
Kshaard wrote:This sort of discussion about an unrelated subject is one reason so many people have moved over to /r/conlangs from here recently.
hashi wrote:I need to get this off my chest, but it annoys me when:
- a noob comes along and learns about phonetics and realises there's more sounds than just English ones and they get this omg-i-have-to-have-ALLOFTHEM mentality
- they think every sound, and every single variation of such needs to be represented by a unique letter (combine this with the first point and you're destined for disastrous creations like čȧûļnó òṽë đðªjŋœªøþĸ$ł€øđ€łjøªþ$£@jœþŋðđµ. Yes, you can have it be totally representative if that was a conscious choice, not if that's the only thing you can do.
- "My language is like.. what happens if Spanish is raped up the ass by French", cause these are the only languages in existence you can take ideas from. Romlangs are not cool.
- Ok, now personally I am one for breaking convention, so it really pisses me off when people say "you <x> for /θ/ because no other language does". Is this not the point in conlanging?? Gosh.
- And then we have the knobs who think that replacing English one letter for letter is conlanging. Someone slap them??
Wario Toad 32 wrote:When people either have to small of a phonology or too large like 3 vowel sounds WTF. Or have a bunch of sounds that practically sound the same to my ears.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 12 guests