Until now, I have the introduction and 1st question of the first part of a listening and the introduction to the grammar. I just wanted to ask for corrections and, of course, for people to join my attempt of creating the Examen Officiale Linguae Latinae (EOLL?)
Here it is:
Probatiō II
PAPYRUS IV AUDITIO (circa XL minuta)
Pars I
Tria extracta differentia audiēs. Quæstiōnibus I–VI, respōnsum (A, B aut C) quod competet optimē sēlige. Duæ quæstiōnēs sunt singulīs sermōnibus.
Extractum Primum
Audīs partem conversātiōnis inter hominem fēminamque quī loquuntur dē suā novā magistrā.
I Quod cōgitat fēmina dē modō suō docendī?
A alumnōs spectat
B rēs expōnere adhūc nōn scit
C citō dīmittētur
[...]
Pars V
Quæstiōnibus XLIII–L, supplē sententiam secundam ut hæc habeat significātiōnem similem sententiæ primæ, verbō datō ūtendō. Verbum datum nōlī mūtāre. Inter tribus sēxque verbīs ūtī dēbent. Hīc est exemplum (0).
Exemplum:
0 Fernanda dēnegāvit toga sorōris suæ gesta esse.
NŌN
Fernanda dīxit ........................................................... stolam sorōris suæ.
Forāmen potest supplērī verbīs “ut nōn gerat”, itaque scrībis:
Scrībe verba absentia MĀIUSCULĪS LITTERĪS in sēparātum papȳrum respōnsōrum.
How does it look to you?