mak wrote:I admit that I sometimes make up grammar rules
...well done, mak
!!! ...you are really one of the few persons in this forum who ''thinks'', while many, probably too many, just ''barks''...
Seriously speaking, from a linguistic point of view the situation of this Latvian Language forum is bad.
There is no moderator who can help the readers of the forum to understand which posts are trustworthy and which are not and the person who has practically attributed herself with this role, instead to confine herself to general information on Latvian grammar and lexicon and notwithstanding the fact that she merrily admitted that she is not a linguist, keeps on flooding this forum with her linguistic ''nonsense'' ... and, even worst, jumping like a vampire to the throat of anyone who seems to put in danger her position of ... ''undisputed queen of the forum''...
The biggest problem with our ''self-appointed wunderkind'' seems to be her conceit and arrogance ... she simply thinks to be much smarter that she actually is...!!!
Unfortunately (or maybe luckily) I am a busy person and, as already told in one of my previous post, I have no time to devote for the lingustic education of our ''Dracula's mother-in-law'' and her henchmen...
...but to leave the readers of this forum at the mercy of our crabby ''old maid'' and her linguistic amateurism would be ... not fair.
So, from now on, ''viņai par lielu prieku'' I will be extremely glad to simply gloss the posts of our ''beloved friend'' with one of the following tags:
ciuppo2000
TRUSTWORTHY CONTENT
ciuppo2000
NOT FULLY TRUSTWORTHY CONTENT
ciuppo2000
UNTRUSTWORTHY CONTENT
so that everybody will be able to draw their own conclusions...and I will not squander too much time!!!
pietro