linguoboy wrote:dEhiN wrote:Osias wrote:Yes, I used 'she' to indicate that I was talking about a specific biker whom I happen to knew was know is a woman.
"Whom I happen to" takes the present tense for the verb following (or the present perfect).
Maybe s/he is no longer a woman?
Sorry, I originally meant to only change "knew" into "know". I'm not sure if "happen to knew" works in your dialect, but I've never heard it before and it sounds ungrammatical to my ears. The tense of "to be" in that sentence could be both in past or present, at least in my dialect.
Osias wrote:Actually, it's me who 'knew' and I don't know anymore.
I think in that case, I would rephrase the whole thing. I suppose you could say something like "...specific biker whom I happened to know is a woman" and that could potentially not be ambiguous (because you're saying she is a woman and that you knew her in the past). I think any other combination of tense with "happen" and "be" could be ambiguous: "whom I happened to know was a woman" could mean she's no longer a woman but was when you knew her; "whom I happen to know was a woman" imples she is definitely no longer a woman. That's why I would rephrase it as "a specific woman/female biker whom I happened to know".