dEhiN wrote:Elaine wrote:The person who is coming after me is learning in at the same time at least seven languages.
In addition, this sounds better to me as "The person who is coming after me is learning at least seven languages at the same time."
france-eesti wrote:I've only lived abroad once in my life; it was in Portugal and it was just very great. Right now I have a family life that makes me remain keeps me in France but as no one can predict the future, no one can say if I won't find myself in Eastern Hungary or in Southern Estonian in the next 20 years...
"Just very great" has too many adverbs. I thought about just deleting one adverb, but "very great" sounds clunky and "just great" can actually sound sarcastic, so I think "great" on its own is enough.
kotrcka wrote:No, I do not have any a bicycle here at the moment but I really loved to ride back then, in the day, when I lived in Slovakia.
"Back then" refers to a time that has been mentioned earlier; since a time hasn't been specified, "back then" is confusing. If you want to, you can replace "back then" with "back in the day". It depends on how long ago you lived in Slovakia. If it was a long time ago, "back in the day" works. Either way, "back then" should be deleted.
kotrcka wrote:The person after me does have a night shifts at work.
There are a lot ways to correct this sentence; it depends on the exact shade of meaning you wanted:
The person after me has a night shift at work.
The person after me has the night shift at work.
The person after me has night shifts at work.
The person after me does a night shift at work.
The person after me does the night shift at work.
The person after me does night shifts at work.
"Does have" is grammatically correct, but it implies that someone has said previously they
don't have a night shift. Since that didn't happen, "does have" is confusing.
Elaine wrote:How may could I even have a night shift if I don't work?
N'hésite pas à corriger mes erreurs.